Cutting ad spend in half while lead volume goes up
A furniture and cabinet retailer came in spending steadily on Google Ads with leads trickling in, but no clear sense of what was actually working. A CallRail audit of where the budget was going turned up the usual culprit: a big chunk was being wasted on mobile game and app placements that looked fine on paper but never turned into real customers.
13 weeks, before and after the cleanup
| Before | After | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly ad spend | $2,576 | $1,145 | -55% |
| Verified leads (calls + forms) | 23 | 41 | +78% |
| Cost per lead | $112 | $28 | -75% |
Spend went down by more than half. Leads still went up. That's the opposite of what usually happens when you cut a budget, and it's proof most of the original spend wasn't doing anything.
What made that possible
- Found where the money was actually going. Over 140 mobile app and game categories (casual games, news apps, and similar low-quality placements) were quietly eating the budget without producing a single real lead. All of them got blocked.
- Rebuilt around one strong campaign. Consolidated spend into a single new shopping-style campaign built around the products people were actually searching to buy, generating 7 times more results than the setup it replaced.
- Cleaned up who could see the ads. Negative keywords blocked traffic from people searching for named competitors, bad-credit financing, and other off-brand terms that were never going to convert.
- Connected the ads to the real store. Synced the campaign with the business's Google Maps listing and built out product categories (beds, sofas, outdoor furniture, and more) so local shoppers searching nearby could find the store directly, not just the website.
Most accounts that look "expensive" aren't actually expensive, they're just spending on the wrong things. Finding and cutting that waste is often worth more than any amount of extra budget.
Want results like this for your business?
Let's talk about your growth